Speaker
Description
This study examined how phonetic errors, task types, and language proficiency affect Chinese L2 comprehensibility. Fifty-nine Japanese university learners performed sentence-reading and question-answering tasks, rated on a 9-point scale by native Chinese speakers. A general linear model showed that tonal errors, segmental errors, and rhythm did not impact comprehensibility, while intonation and sentence segmentation did. A linear mixed-effects model revealed higher comprehensibility in reading tasks and increased comprehensibility with proficiency.
Summary
This study examined how phonetic errors, task types, and language proficiency affect Chinese L2 comprehensibility. Fifty-nine Japanese university learners performed sentence-reading and question-answering tasks, rated on a 9-point scale by native Chinese speakers. A general linear model showed that tonal errors, segmental errors, and rhythm did not impact comprehensibility, while intonation and sentence segmentation did. A linear mixed-effects model revealed higher comprehensibility in reading tasks and increased comprehensibility with proficiency.
| Teaching Context | College and university education |
|---|